Present a Pitch in the Social Impact Labs
Do you have an organization, program, or idea that is less than six years old? Receive mentoring from an esteemed panel of experts, while also making connections and receiving guidance from the conference audience. GHIC 2017 includes two categories of Social Impact Labs: Early Stage (idea, program, or organization is less than 3 years old, and ideas in the brainstorming stage are also eligible) and Established Program (program or organization is 3-6 years old). A newer program (0-6 years old) that is within an established (7+ year old) organization qualifies for the Social Impact Lab category as well.
Selected participants will present their new idea, program, or organization in the format of a 5-minute social impact pitch. Following the pitch, there is a 15-minute period for discussion with two expert conference speakers, questions and answers, and feedback from the audience. This will provide participants with an opportunity to formulate and present their program, collaborate with others interested in their idea, and receive feedback, ideas, and mentoring from expert speakers and from other conference participants. Professionals and students are eligible to submit a social impact pitch.
- Categories and Eligibility
- Deadlines, Abstract Review, and Selection
- How to Apply
- Acceptance and next steps
- What presentations have been accepted thus far for the GHIC 2017 Social Impact Labs?
- Additional questions
GHIC 2017 includes two categories of Social Impact Labs, and there are therefore two pitch abstract submission options:
- Early-Stage Pitch Presentation: These presentations are ideas that are being developed, meaning that the ideas are in the brainstorming, early development, or early implementation stage. This category is for any early-stage idea, program, or organization that is less than three years old. The Social Impact Lab expert panel will offer ideas and suggestions to further advance the start-up organization or early-stage idea. The conference audience will also offer ideas, feedback, and networking opportunities.
- Established Program Pitch Presentation: The established program presentation is a program or organization that is 3-6 years old. These programs and organizations should be looking to further advance, grow, or scale their initiatives. The Social Impact Lab expert panel will offer guidance about advancing or growing the program or organization. The conference audience will also offer ideas, feedback, and networking opportunities.
The social impact pitch should be program-focused and can be targeted for any country or countries worldwide. The non-profit or for-profit idea, program, or organization can be related to any field within health, development, education, or entrepreneurship. Themes include, but are not limited to, public health, social innovation and entrepreneurship, development, education, energy, environment, and technology. Professionals and students are eligible to submit a social impact lab abstract and to participate in the Social Impact Labs at the Global Health & Innovation Conference.
What is a Social Impact Pitch?
The social impact pitch sessions ("Social Impact Labs") at the Global Health & Innovation Conference are a unique opportunity for the innovators and entrepreneurs to present their ideas in the format of a 5-minute pitch. Following each presenter’s 5-minute pitch, there is a 15-minute period for discussion and mentoring with two expert speakers, questions, answers, and feedback from the audience. The goal is a dynamic session in which participants and speakers will network and collaborate about the innovative ideas, programs, and organizations.
"In pitching Clean Life Corps at the Global Health & Innovation Conference, I felt as though it was the first time I had a room full of people who were truly listening to what we have to say… and to the novice ‘phil-entrepreneur’, that support and grounded feedback mean everything."--Trevor Thunell, Engineer, 2013 Pitch Presenter
What is the difference between the Social Impact Lab and the Oral and Poster Presentation Abstract Category?
The Social Impact Lab is an opportunity to pitch a program to the audience, and to receive mentoring and feedback from experts and from the audience. As detailed in the Social Impact Lab selection criteria, applicants to the Social Impact Lab must highlight the evidence basis for the program, as well as include a specific plan to collect data and measure outcomes to prove effectiveness.
In contrast, the Oral and Poster Presentation Abstract offers an opportunity to present the results and data from a program or organization, or from research studies.
Social Impact Lab Expert Panelists:
Each Social Impact Lab session will include four social impact pitch presenters and two expert panelists. The expert panelists will offer guidance, advice, and mentoring to the pitch presenters.
- David Barash, Executive Director, Global Health Portfolio and Chief Medical Officer, GE Foundation
- Ned Breslin, Chief Executive Officer, Water For People
- Dean Cycon, Founder and CEO, Dean's Beans Organic Coffee Co.
- Sam Daley-Harris, CEO, Center for Citizen Empowerment and Transformation, A Project of RESULTS Educational Fund
- Paul Ellingstad, Director of Human Progress Initiatives, HP Corporate Affairs, Hewlett-Packard
- Bobby Jefferson, Chief Technology Officer, DAI Global Health
- Lisa Hirschhorn, Director of Implementation and Improvement Science, Ariadne Labs; Assistant Professor of Clinical Medicine, Harvard Medical School
- Jordan Levy, Chief External Relations Officer, Ubuntu Education Fund
- Charles MacCormack, President Emeritus, Save the Children; Executive Chair, Health MDG Alliance
- Rodney North, The Answer Man - Information for the Public and Media, Equal Exchange Coop
- Chris Underhill, Founder, BasicNeeds
- Joe Whinney, Founder and CEO, Theo Chocolate, Inc.
- Additional expert panelists TBA
The final, firm deadline is March 16, 2017.
Qualified submissions will be invited for video submission, and the highest quality video submitters will be selected for presentation at the conference.
First, submit an abstract: Submit an abstract on the Conference Registration Page at the time that you register to attend the conference. When you submit your registration form and payment to attend the conference, your social impact pitch abstract will be automatically submitted to Unite For Sight for review. You must submit your abstract at the same time that you submit your conference registration payment. If your registration and payment do not transmit properly, please review the page to be sure that you have filled in all of the required fields on the form.
Second, submit a 5-minute video: The highest quality abstracts will be invited to submit a 5-minute video of their proposed pitch. The 2017 conference's social impact pitch presenters will be selected based on the quality of the video application submissions.
We welcome submissions pertaining to all fields relevant to global health, international development, and social entrepreneurship.
You may see the 2016 social impact pitches at http://www.uniteforsight.org/conference/speakers-2016#pitches, the 2014 social impact pitches at http://www.uniteforsight.org/conference/speakers-2014#pitches, the 2013 social impact pitches at http://www.uniteforsight.org/conference/speakers-2013#pitches, and you may see the 2012 social impact pitches at http://www.uniteforsight.org/conference/speakers-2012-sorted#pitches.
Conference Registration is Required
Submitting an abstract represents a commitment to attend the 2017 Global Health & Innovation Conference, irrespective of acceptance of an abstract. The opportunity to submit an abstract for consideration is available only to those who plan to attend the conference for educational and networking purposes, and not to those who wish to attend exclusively for the opportunity to present. Therefore, all persons submitting an abstract must register and submit payment to attend the conference at the time that they submit the abstract.
Abstract Submission Format and Selection Criteria
Before submitting a pitch abstract, please first review the pitch abstract instructions and examples.
Abstract: 250 word maximum (longer abstracts will not be reviewed and will be automatically rejected)
Format: The abstract must be formatted to include problem, solution, innovation, based in evidence, expected impact, management and financing, stage of idea, and your "ask". Please include the headers (i.e. problem, solution, innovation, based in evidence, expected impact, management and financing, stage of idea, your "ask"). The headers do not count towards the word count.
- Category: Early stage (<3 years), or Established (3-6 years)
- Age of program/organization:
- Problem: Describe the problem that you are trying to solve.
- Solution: What is your proposed innovative solution? Why is it important? How will it be implemented in the field?
- Innovation: How is the idea new and innovative?
- Based in Evidence: How is your solution evidence-based? Why will it work? This is very important criteria for evaluation. We encourage you to read this article about evidence-based program design: http://www.uniteforsight.org/public-health-management/evidence-based-programs
- Impact: This is the most important criteria for evaluation. In order to be accepted for presentation, the pitch must discuss the current or expected outcomes, and the abstract must also delineate how these outcomes are or will be measured. To help ensure that you effectively identify and discuss outcomes (and not outputs), please read about the critical difference between outputs and outcomes: http://www.uniteforsight.org/global-health-university/outcomes
- Early-stage category: What is the Expected Impact? What are your plans to measure outcomes and impact?
- Established-stage category: What is the current impact and data, or what are your upcoming plans to measure outcomes and impact? If there is no current impact data, explain why the data has not yet been collected.
- Management and Financing: Who is leading the program or organization? What are the current or proposed funding sources or revenues? The abstract submitter must be directly involved with the leadership or management of the program or organization.
- Describe Stage of Idea: What is your progress? How much funding, if any, has been raised? When was the idea initially developed?
- Your "ask": Describe your current program development needs. How are you hoping to advance your program or idea by presenting a pitch at the Global Health & Innovation Conference? For example, are you hoping to receive feedback on a specific aspect of your program, connect with advisors, connect with prospective volunteers, network with others involved in your field, identify funding sources, etc. If selected for presentation at the conference, you will include your "ask" at the end of your pitch presentation.
Selection Criteria: The pitch abstract must exactly adhere to the published format, and all sections must be included. If any sections are omitted, the abstract will be disqualified and rejected. The pitch abstract will be evaluated based on the level of innovation, the expected impact and description of metrics, and the details that indicate that it is evidence-based and will be effective. As highlighted above, in order to be accepted for presentation, the pitch must discuss expected or current outcomes, and how the outcomes have been, or will be measured. The submission must be well-written and demonstrate thought and attention to detail. Avoid jargon and be sure that your audience understands exactly what you are proposing or describing.
Video Submission Format (Part 2 of Application Process)
The video submission opportunity is available only to those who are invited, based on the quality of their written abstract, to submit the video presentation for consideration. The video submission must be no longer than 5 minutes, and all of the content required in the abstract must be included in the video presentation. The video will also be evaluated based on the quality of the presentation and by the presenter's ability to effectively and clearly communicate the pitch. If selected for presentation at the conference, the presenter would convey the content of the 5-minute video in their 5-minute pitch presentation on April 22-23, 2017. Video submissions that are longer than 5 minutes, omit any of the required content, or read from a script, will be automatically disqualified. In order to be accepted for presentation, the video must demonstrate and confirm that the pitch describes a locally-developed and locally-responsible program or organization.
- What is the name of your organization or program? Is it a non-profit or a for-profit organization?
- How old is your organization or program?
- What is your role and title in the organization?
- Describe in detail what your organization does.
- What problem are you working to solve, what is your solution, and why is your program or organization innovative and important?
- How is your program based in evidence?
- What are the proposed or existing sources of revenue?
- To date, what is the current impact, or what is your expected impact? How do you measure impact?
- In order to be accepted for presentation, you must discuss the current or expected outcomes and how these outcomes are measured. To help ensure that you effectively identify and discuss outcomes (and not outputs), please read about the critical difference between outputs and outcomes: http://www.uniteforsight.org/global-health-university/outcomes
- What type of guidance would you like to request from the expert speakers? For example, what are your current two greatest challenges? What ideas or proposals are you currently considering?
- What are three questions that you would like to ask the expert speakers?
- How are you hoping to advance your program or organization by presenting to the audience at the Global Health & Innovation Conference? If the audience is excited about your program, how can they invest human or financial resources into your program? Do you need funds to launch or scale your organization? Would you like feedback? Are you seeking advisors or partners?
The video will be evaluated exclusively based on the quality of the presentation, and not based on the quality of the videotaping. Simply videotaping on a mobile device (iphone, ipad, etc.), for example, will be suitable. Videos that are any longer than 5 minutes will be automatically disqualified. Those who are invited to submit the video (step 2 of the application process) will receive instructions for submission.
Co-authors and Co-founders
The conference participant who will be in attendance and presenting the pitch must submit the abstract under their name. If both authors will be in attendance, then either of you may submit the pitch, but the pitch must be submitted only once for consideration. The author submitting the pitch must be the presenter at the conference, and this author will also receive all communication from Unite For Sight. Other authors are encouraged to attend the conference, but the other authors may not present the pitch at the conference.
If my social impact pitch is accepted for oral presentation, what are the next steps?
- The abstract author will be notified that their abstract has been reviewed and accepted for presentation at the conference.
- The author will be required to submit social impact pitch presenter agreement in order to confirm their intent to give an oral presentation at the conference.
- Accepted presenters must adhere to deadlines and guidelines, and they must promptly respond to communication.
What should be included in the social impact pitch presentation at the conference?
If you are accepted to present at the conference, you should include all of the important items in your abstract: problem, solution, innovation, evidence-base, impact, management and financing as well as the stage of your idea and your "ask". When you are creating and practicing your presentation, you should consider what you hope to learn from the experience. What type of ideas/plans and obstacles are you currently working through? What type of people do you hope to connect with at the conference and during your session? The answers to these questions may help you to highlight certain aspect of your pitch and de-emphasize others.
The most effective presentations will explain your innovation in a way that is immediately understood by the audience. By the end of the presentation, the audience should understand why the idea is needed, how the idea will be implemented, and how the impact will occur. In general, it is best to avoid using jargon or abstract ideas. Instead, the pitch should provide concrete examples and real-life stories to illustrate the plan. While you will have 5 minutes for your presentation, the more succinctly you are able to communicate your idea, the better. Therefore, you should practice your social impact pitch in advance to ensure that it is no more than 5 minutes. A bell will ring to conclude your presentation at 5 minutes.
What presentations have been accepted thus far for presentation in the GHIC 2017 Social Impact Labs?
- “Barakat Bundle,” Nayab Ahmad, Director of Product Development, Barakat Bundle
- “NeMo: Neonatal Monitoring - Providing Tools to Empower Mothers to Identify Neonatal Danger Signs Within the First Week of Life,” Rachel An, Project Engineer, Johns Hopkins University
- “A Train Ride a Day Keeps the Doctor Away: Expanding Healthcare Access in Urban Brazil,” Isaac S. Andino, Undergraduate Student, Grinnell College
- “KNO2 Sensor: A Wearable Device for Measuring Oxygen Saturation in Low and Middle Resource Settings,” Maria Artunduaga, MTM Student, UCSF/UCBerkeley
- “Semilla Nueva: Improving Seeds to Overcome Childhood Malnutrition,” Curt Bowen, Executive Director and Co-Founder, Semilla Nueva
- “Creating a Global Genetic Database for Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Identifying Relevant Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Frequencies,” Kelly Hilton, MD Student, Nova Southeastern University
- “Veripad: Low-Cost Screening of Falsified and Substandard Pharmaceuticals,” Bishoy Ghobryal, Chief Executive Officer, Veripad
- “Detroit’s Golden Hour: Grassroots EMS Capacity-Building,” Alex Green, Project Lead, Detroit’s Golden Hour; MD Student, The Wayne State University School of Medicine
- “QCare: A Quality of Care Dashboard for Humanitarian Settings,” Heather Howard, Health Technical Advisor, American Refugee Committee
- “Opening Up Data for Social Good, Sustainability, and Scale,” Nitya Kanuri, Open Data Collaborations Manager, Crisis Text Line
- “Expanding Midlevel Emergency Medicine Abroad; Certificate Program for Clinical Officers at Sagam Hospital, Kenya,” Jessica McTighe, PA-C, Division of Global Health, Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital
- “SubQ Assist: Expanding Access to Long-Term Contraceptive Implants through Task-Shifting Devices,” Ibrahim Mohedas, Post-Doctoral Fellow, University of Michigan Department of Engineering
- “Mission Hydrate: An Initiative to Curb Chronic Dehydration and Kidney Disease Among Farmworkers,” Anthony Nardone, Founder, Mission Hydrate
- “Raise the Roof: Implementing Locally-Approved Ventilation Systems to Combat Indoor Cooking Fires,” Emily Nieson, Undergraduate Student, Baylor University
- “The Household Electro-Game - An Interactive Game that Promotes Discussion among Various Groups of People When Playing, Geared to Inform, Educate and Change Attitudes and Behaviors,” Susan Otchere, Senior Technical Advisor in Health, World Vision US
- “Nursing for All: Nursing Care Where It's Needed,” Laura J. Ridge, Board President, Nursing for All; PhD Candidate, New York University
- “Thinking Inside the Box: Using Portable Alternative Cribs to Combat Instances of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome in Maryland,” Shantell Roberts, Social Innovation Lab, Johns Hopkins University
- “Human Rights and Health Care: A Rural Dentistry Model in Nepal,” Laura Spero, Founder and Director, Jevaia Foundation, Inc.
- “Gambia Goat Dairy,” Corey Spies, VMD Class of 2019, University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine
- “Community Voices in Government Decision-Making aim to Improve Support Programs in Botswana,” Ran van der Wal, PhD Candidate, McGill University
- “Drones to Doors: Increasing Rural Access to Severe Malaria Commodities,” Kim van der Weijde, Project Assistant for Access and Project Management, Medicines for Malaria Venture
- “A Training-Education Protocol For Implementing Kangaroo Mother Care With Breast Feeding Support for High Risk Neonates in Rural Africa,” Linda Winkler, Professor of Anthropology, Wilkes University
- “Finding IMPACT: Improving Public Health Management for Action,” Alison Yoos, Evaluation Lead, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- “SOS Aquaponics: Sustainable Food Technology to Empower Children’s Communities,” Adina Zhang, Undergraduate Student, Cornell University
- “Social Entrepreneurship for Sexual Health (SESH): Using Crowdsourcing to Promote Sexual Health among Marginalized Populations,” Philip Zhang, MD Student, Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine
If you have any questions, please email Connor Orrico at firstname.lastname@example.org